Rush limbaugh live los angeles8/9/2023 ![]() ![]() (laughing) I’m not making any of this up. It took months, and it took the greatest negotiators the city could find, but they finally beat the homeless. The homeless wanted to maintain rat-infested items and other possessions that present health hazards in the city. Therefore, the city of LA had to fight to win the ability to destroy “rat-infested items and other possessions that present health hazards like typhus.” The homeless wanted to hold onto all that. The homeless know what they want and they want what’s theirs and they drove a hard bargain. The homeless drove a tough bargain here, folks. In these negotiations - which were long and drawn out. ![]() If the homeless put a refrigerator or a sofa on a sidewalk, the city of Los Angeles had to negotiate for the permission to come in and demand that the sofa or refrigerator on the sidewalk be moved. The city agreed that it will not stop it from expanding.Ī fifty-block area in downtown LA! Under the agreement, my friends, the city of Los Angeles can remove “large items” from the homeless like refrigerators and sofas if they’re blocking the sidewalk. The city agreed not to put a cap “on the total amount of property that homeless people can keep on skid row.” Skid row is 50 blocks, and they can’t stop it from growing. So the size we’re talking about is a 50-block area in downtown. There are “its ” there are “theirs.” There are any number of personal pronouns accepted now. Uh… Pfft! (chuckles) There are more than guys and gals now. ![]() The city of Los Angeles agreed not to put a cap “on the total amount of property that homeless people can keep on skid row.” So the city of Los Angeles negotiated to extend a certain number of acres or blocks or whatever to the homeless, as in, “This is yours, guys - and gals.” We’re not… I mean, that’s what they’re talking about here. How can anybody have property and be homeless? “Property” being defined as real estate here. How many of you, wherever you live, drive by a homeless encampment and think, “We need to negotiate”? What would you negotiate? You’re only allowed to leave this tent city on these hours, and, if you do, you cannot steal people’s shopping carts? What would you negotiate with them? Just the very idea that there will be negotiations - and they went on for months! Well, the negotiations ended last week when the city of Los Angeles agreed not to put a cap “on the total amount of property that homeless people can keep on skid row.” Now, they’ve been negotiating with the homeless in Los Angeles for months, and those negotiations with the homeless… ![]() It’s a status quo that must have official sanction and relationship with a government. It’s not something to be eradicated, it’s not something that is considered a problem. As though it is a constant, accepted and taken-for-granted way of living in Los Angeles. Negotiating with the homeless! Negotiating with representatives of the homeless. The city of Los Angeles has been negotiating with the homeless. They have been negotiating with the homeless for months. The city of Los Angeles has entered into a legal settlement with the homeless. If you just hear this as casually referenced like in a commentary, the impact of it might not be what it should be. Let me first double down on something that was used recently in one of our Morning Update commentaries that airs nationwide on all of our EIB affiliates. That’s not how these kinds of things are approached by me or on this program. I’m not gonna jump in and use some of this data as people who just want to create clicks or create outrageous reactions so people will talk about it do. Now, I know it’s easy to cherry-pick, and it’s easy to make generalizations, which I want to avoid doing. From all intents and purposes, California is a socialist state. Of course, that encompasses attitudinal and behavioral and everything else. California’s Democrats… California, politically, is a socialist state now - and I say that in the meaning of the term ideologically. The people in California didn’t want to hear that. The former governor of Colorado gets booed off the stage, practically, for simply saying heading in the direction of socialism is not… Not “heading in the direction.” Socialism is not the answer. RUSH: More on the California Democrat convention and the booing of John Hickenlooper. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |